Judge Cannon Cited Janet Reno When Dismissing the Documents Case. Here’s What Reno Actually Said.

Bill Clinton’s attorney general never argued that the appointment of a special prosecutor is lawless.

Attorney General Janet Reno

Janet Reno’s Senate testimony in 1999 argued in favor of returning to a practice of special prosecutors. CHARLIE DHARAPAK/AP

When U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon tanked the classified documents case against Donald Trump, she argued that she was not alone in her reasoning that it’s “dangerous” to have rogue prosecutors involved in politically sensitive investigations.

Another critic of independent prosecutors, Cannon wrote, was a Democrat: Bill Clinton’s attorney general, Janet Reno.

Except, a closer inspection of Reno’s Senate testimony in 1999 offers a very different reading of the current situation. Reno didn’t argue that the appointment of a special prosecutor is lawless, but rather, that Congress did away with a law specifically carving out an “independent counsel” to make sure future prosecutors like Smith were better controlled.